What does Supreme Court ruling on narco test means today’s article notes

What did the Supreme Court rule?

  • It set aside the Patna High Court order (Amlesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, 2025) allowing an involuntary narco test.
  • Reduces a subject’s inhibitions and reasoning ability.
  • Considered non-violent, similar to polygraph or brain mapping.
  • No accused can be compelled to be a witness against themselves.
  • Narco tests without consent = compulsion, hence unconstitutional.
  • Includes Right to Privacy (as per Maneka Gandhi case).
  • Forced narco tests violate privacy and bodily autonomy.
  • Violation of privacy affects liberty and fairness, thus breaching the Golden Triangle.
  • Narco test results:
    • Cannot confirm guilt.
    • Information can aid investigation but must be corroborated with other evidence.
    • Consent must be informed, recorded before a Magistrate, with medical & legal safeguards.
  • Must be voluntary, informed, recorded before a magistrate.
  • But no absolute right to demand narco analysis.
  • Based on individual autonomy.

More Crisp notes own notes.

Supreme Court has given a judgement to brink back the women who was pregnant and deported to Bangladesh. She was forced to do Narco test which is against the constitution.

According to Supreme Court Narco test cannot be done forcefully as it requires a prior consent for it according to Article 20(3). Narco test is a process of giving drug to the person which blocks that persons reasoning capability.

The convict person can use it for proving him on last stage.

According to Kantian ethics without consent anything is unethical.

For more contact us.

Facebook

Scroll to Top